The Saab Variable Compression (SVC) engine was a development project of Saab Automobile, for which it won an “Best technology of the year” award both in 2000 and 2001.
The SVC engine combines the excellent fuel consumption of a 1.6 liter engine and the power of 3 liter engine.
During normal driving the engine uses high compression to acchieve low fuel consuption. When the driver requests a fast acceleration the engine responds by changing the compression ratio to aviod knock at the same time as it boost the engine using the compressor.
As seen, the SVC engine have a cylinder head with integrated cylinders – which is known as monohead. The monohead is pivoted at the crankcase and its slope can be adjusted slightly (up to 4 degrees) in relation to the engine block, pistons, crankcase etc. by means of a hydraulic actuator, therefore the volume of the combustion chamber (when piston is in compressed position) can be varied. In other words, compression ratio is also variable.
For testing purposes, in a Saab 9-5 fitted with an early version of the SVC engine that produced 168 kW (225 hp) @ rpm5800 (and Max torque 305 Nm @ 40000 rpm), at the time this engine is demonstrated its potential in terms of power, torque, and general flexibility while generating the sort of aural tones that buyers of sports sedans appreciate…
The SVC project was shelved by General Motors, when it took over Saab Automobile, due to cost.
I didn’t realized it then, but Saab would have been better of not doing the variable compression project, already in prototype 4-cyl version, we understood that the noise issue with the construction was extremely difficult to overcome, and the benefits with the variable compression a bitt les than you first would guess.
It tock almost al resources for other per-development work, and strangled the boosted air-guided GDI project that was / trying to run in parallel, if that would have been getting the correct resources, Saab would have been 5-7 years ahead of the rest, in producing very strong and fuel efficiency boosted GDI engines. That likely would have given a good and needed sales push for Saab.
Br Svante
Another great technological idea killed by GM! Gross Mismanagement.
Was absolutely amazing at the time. Also seem to remember it was the most powerful 1.6 L engine in the world.
Saab SVC was a crazy concept well ahaed of its time
I have seen it idling in a Saab 9-5 Gen1 in Saab Museum.
This was later taken on by Nissan i believe..
I thought they were 2.6L 5pot that was supposed to replace the 2.8L V6. It would have been great if they could have seen it’s development through to production. Although I could see issues in the long term with lifting the cylinder walls and head up to drop compression then dropping it right down for high compression. Pushing the compression up to 12/13-1 would make the engine very efficient at part throttle cruising high intake manifold vacuum. This is a more efficient way to make low load torque than the Atkinson cycle they used on the “1.8” where it ejected 10% of the cylinders volume back into the intake manifold. This drops the dynamic compression by 10% while retaining the full expansion ratio of the 2L giving the charge more distance and time to burn, in my opinion this type of thing should be a VVT setting for low load but goes back to Otto cycle once load goes up.
The seals were the issue. Peugeot had a comparable principle but it was canned too.
I’m from Serbia, and I’ve been trying to find this engine for a long time, but of course, the SVC is like a ghost. I am a passionate driver, And as crazy as it sounds, I would love this engine in my car.
I know that few left the factory in various ways.
So, if anyone have any kind of rumor, I’m here😄
Even technical drawings of the engine are good.