Table of Contents
- 1 The Designer Who Came to Save Saab
- 2 The 9-3 Phoenix Project – Saab’s Unseen Rebirth
- 3 Collapse in Trollhättan: A Dream Cut Short
- 4 From Pininfarina to PhoeniX – Castriota’s Design Legacy
- 5 Henrik Bergman’s AI Renaissance
- 6 The Meaning of This Digital Rebirth
- 7 Saab Lives On – In Design, in Spirit, and Now in Pixels
The Designer Who Came to Save Saab
When Jason Castriota joined Saab Automobile AB as Design Director in June 2010, the brand was fighting for its life. Born in White Plains, New York (1974) and raised in Greenwich, Connecticut, Castriota built his career in Italy, first at Pininfarina and later at Bertone, crafting some of the most acclaimed modern GTs – including the Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano, Maserati GranTurismo, and Rolls-Royce Hyperion.

His design philosophy was simple yet daring: “functional beauty driven by aerodynamics.” It was a perfect fit for Saab’s aircraft heritage – Born from Jets was about to gain new meaning. Castriota’s task in Trollhättan was monumental: create a new Saab 9-3 from the ground up, one that would modernize the 900 legacy while launching the brand’s all-new Phoenix Architecture, a modular platform intended to underpin every future Saab.
The 9-3 Phoenix Project – Saab’s Unseen Rebirth
While the world remembers the Saab PhoeniX Concept from the 2011 Geneva Motor Show, few realize it was merely a preview of the next 9-3. Behind closed doors, Castriota’s team had nearly finished a production design – internally nicknamed “9-3 Phoenix.”

The car combined Nordic simplicity with Italian sensuality. It featured a sculpted front fascia dominated by a modernized “wing” grille, a tapered canopy reminiscent of jet cockpits, and strong, flowing shoulders that echoed the classic Saab 900 Combi Coupe.

Unlike previous generations, this 9-3 would have been lower, wider, and far more dynamic, with proportions similar to a compact GT. Castriota envisioned it as Saab’s global core model – available as a sedan, SportCombi, convertible, and later a coupe inspired by the Sonett.

Inside, the design returned to Saab’s cockpit-centric DNA: aircraft-style instruments, a wraparound dashboard, and minimalist ergonomics. Every detail carried aerodynamic purpose, a reflection of Castriota’s belief that “form must follow the flow of air.”
Collapse in Trollhättan: A Dream Cut Short
By late 2011, Saab’s financial crisis overwhelmed its ambitions. Suppliers halted deliveries, development froze, and production stopped at the Trollhättan factory.
When Saab declared bankruptcy in December 2011, the new 9-3 – still in clay and digital form – was sealed inside the design studio, never to see the road. Castriota’s team had already finalized the exterior surfacing and interior layout; prototypes were ready for aerodynamic testing.
In a later interview, Castriota reflected on that moment: “We had the design, the passion, the DNA – everything was aligned. We just ran out of time.” For Saab enthusiasts, that line encapsulates an entire decade of “what if.”
From Pininfarina to PhoeniX – Castriota’s Design Legacy
Castriota’s Saab tenure may have been brief, but it produced some of the most striking forms in the brand’s history. The PhoeniX Concept, with its flowing body and dramatic “muscular spine,” embodied his design thesis: an aeronautical sculpture grounded in Swedish restraint.
After Saab’s fall, Castriota continued to make waves in the automotive world – first as Chief Designer at SSC North America, where he penned the Tuátara, then at Ford Motor Company, where he now leads Advanced Design for future mobility programs. Through his studio, Castriota Design, he collaborates with MJS Groupe on brand strategy and vehicle innovation projects, combining physical and digital design worlds.
Yet among Saab fans, his name remains synonymous with the last great design chapter of the brand.

Henrik Bergman’s AI Renaissance
More than a decade later, Swedish artist Henrik Bergman Rydgren – whose work we recently featured on SaabPlanet (follow his project saabvisions on Instagram) – decided to digitally resurrect Castriota’s lost 9-3. Using a combination of AI generative models and manual post-editing, he created a hyper-realistic visualization titled “Saab’s Lost Future.”
In Bergman’s scene, Castriota’s 9-3 finally escapes the sterile studio: the car sits in a misty Nordic forest, sunlight glinting off its bodywork, surrounded by nature – a setting it was always meant to inhabit but never reached.

“Before the lights dimmed in Trollhättan, designer Jason Castriota was sketching a rebirth – bold, sculpted, and unmistakably Saab,” Bergman wrote in his post. The image went viral within the Saab community, gathering hundreds of shares and comments. Fans described it as “the Saab we should have had” and “proof that great design never dies.”
The Meaning of This Digital Rebirth
Bergman’s recreation is more than nostalgia – it’s a dialogue between past and future. Artificial intelligence, often blamed for soulless automation, here becomes a tool of remembrance, bridging unfinished design work with modern creative technology.
Through Bergman’s art, the unfinished 9-3 Phoenix gains a new life – not on asphalt, but in the collective imagination of Saab enthusiasts. It demonstrates how digital craftsmanship can preserve heritage long after factories fall silent.
Castriota’s lines, once trapped in clay and CAD files, now breathe again – rendered by an artist who, like Saab itself, believes in innovation born from emotion.
Saab Lives On – In Design, in Spirit, and Now in Pixels
Trollhättan’s assembly lines may be still, but the Saab story continues to evolve through its community — fans, restorers, engineers, and digital artists alike. From Castriota’s visionary sketches to Bergman’s AI-powered tributes, Saab design philosophy endures: intelligent, aerodynamic, human.

The lost 9-3 Phoenix stands today as a reminder that progress isn’t always measured by production numbers.
Sometimes, the most profound creations are those that never left the studio – until someone, years later, gives them wings again.
- Unveiling the Lost Saab PhoeniX Concept: A Tragic Tale of Destruction and Innovation
- Former Saab Design Director Jason Castriota to Lead Ford’s Advanced Design Studio
- Chris Bangle and Jason Castriota Discuss the Saab PhoeniX Concept
- How Henrik Bergman Rydgren Is Redefining Saab’s Legacy with Stunning AI Creations
- What Jason Castriota Told About the 9-3 Phoenix












![Team Tidö at Ring Knutstorp [video] 24 Team Tidö at Ring Knutstorp [video] 3](https://i0.wp.com/www.saabplanet.com/wp-content/uploads/team-tido2.jpg?resize=364%2C225&ssl=1)




Nice cars and excellenet reimaginations by Bergman but these concepts are not very Saabish. I only see a few Saab design clues, of which the not working ledbar on the red coupe is one of them.
Much better than the absolute nothing we have currently, although not 100% my personal taste. I would be very happy to see them on the road.
Built in China. I do like the fact that it would still have the Triumph inspired engines
They should have stuck with Padian as chief.
This car should to be produced. I would love to own a such one
They need to do a reissue of the classic 900 hatchback 3 door (pre General Motors, who ruined the company). That is the iconic SAAB design!
The front looks a bit chunky, but I like the back and side profile. It somewhat resembles the Hyundai Ionic 6.
It would have been a success! Think it has similarities with my Polestar 2 (AI-tuned to red) 😊
I would like to buy one or other of this car right now
The new Saab 9-3 series (project 540) rather close to production/tooling in 2012.
Allready back then with lighted brandemblems in red at the back start to be seen on the rodes 2025 on VW, Cupra & Audi brands.
Every time I see these images I think the same thing: you guys are trying to resurrect the wrong Saab.
The second gen 9-3 was not that good. I’m sorry, I know it’s really popular, but compared to its predecessor, and certainly the 900’s that came before it, it was a heavily value-engineered machine with questionable build quality.
If we want to actually resurrect Saab, we should be drawing on the 99 or 900 for inspiration and engineering – not a car that was primarily made from GM components.
(I mean no disrespect, everyone has their preferences, but have had both classic 900’s and a 2010 9-3, there simply is no comparison).
I never liked Castriota’s designs. IMO he never truly understood Saab design language. The last GM facelifted versions of the 9-3 and the new gen 9-5 were much more in keeping with Saab design language than Castriota’s.
As for JC’s 9-3 it looked like a badly executed 900 tribute act, with a stuck on rear spoiler that looked like an afterthought, and a flat roof that looked at odds with the curvature of the rest of the car.
The Phoenix concept looks too much like all other cars out there. Anyone can easily find a Saab in a crowded and vast parking lot now (1st, 2nd & 3rd Gen); Castriota’s design has ZERO Saab uniqueness, except for the front and rear logos.
there were a 9-3 replacement in the same style as the 9X BioHybrid/9X Air that I saw during my time at GM Europe design in Rüsselsheim (2007) that were much much nicer actually. It was like a “combi -coupe”-9X BioHybrid. Shame it had to die before it got born… 😕
Not very Saab-like to be fair. Simon Paduans version is much much better.
Honestly there’s a designer or a page named Victus Design they have some of the best renders for new Saab ideas. They have done a lot of renders and I don’t like all of them but most of them are better than most of the ideas I’ve seen anywhere else. I feel like he at least has history with Saab vehicles or at least studies the design language.